Monday, 31 January 2011

Interview with Rosalind Davis

 
I am delighted to interview Rosalind Davis a practicing artist, writer, lecturer, elective member of AIR Artists Advisory Group, and co-director of Core Gallery.

Core Gallery launched in April 2010 with the experimental curatorial exhibition 'Exquisite Corpse' since then it has continued to thrive into a dynamic and innovative space for contemporary arts and has worked with around 100 emerging and established, international and UK artists and curators.




In this interview we look to the past and survey Core Gallery’s 2010 highlights, we find out the commitment and work that goes into sustaining a gallery. I get a peek into this year’s exciting programme and discuss the cultural relevance of artist run spaces.


8,000 Souls Part II, Oil and embroidery on cotton, 60 x 40 cm, 2009 © Rosalind Davis




Rosalind Davis is a graduate from the RCA (2005) and Chelsea College of Art (2003) She has exhibited her work nationally and internationally.

Davis also has a blog on Artist’s talking on visual arts directory a-n (www.a-n.co.uk) which has received much acclaim, winning one of 2009’s blog of the year. It was also selected by Matt Roberts (Matt Roberts Arts) as a choice blog of the month in July 2009.


February 2011>>



CP: Can you tell us about Core Gallery’s ethos and how this is unique within Deptford’s art community?

RD: Core Gallery invites curators into the space to explore their practices, they are free to develop ideas and bring in artists that they feel will fit; they work without limitations as much as possible.  We in return do our utmost to promote and facilitate their shows, connecting them with other artists, spaces and opportunities wherever possible.

The Deptford Arts community is a very exciting one and each space has its uniqueness and our colleagues here have been very warm and inviting, if it had not been for such a rich artistic landscape here then it is unlikely we would have set up the gallery – we felt we would like to contribute somehow and in turn create something exciting in an underused space which would also feed into our studio artist’s practice and nurture networks.

Here are two very good quotes from 2 curators we worked with at Core in 2010 which does better than I in expressing what Core is about:

One of the few truly eclectic contemporary art spaces in London, Core Gallery's first year of exhibitions and events has been diverse, thought provoking and substantial.


As a writer/curator Core Gallery has provided me with the space, the support and the network to develop my ideas, try out new things and showcase new and emerging artists. Core Gallery is proving to be a vital addition to the South East London art community.

Andrew Bryant


“Working with Core Gallery is an energising and inspiring experience for me as a curator. It embodies many of the most positive aspects of artist led spaces, acting as a platform for risk taking, experimentation and diversity of practice with real commitment to and engagement with the development of the local arts ecology”

Nick Kaplony


Artist Talk: The Eighteenth Emergency, 2010 © Core Gallery


CP: William Morris declared in his 1884 lecture ‘Art & Socialism’ that: Association instead of competition, social order instead of individualist anarchy were the ways to free creativity and return it to the working man. How pertinent would you say that this statement is today? What associations have arisen from the conception of Core Gallery?

RD: I believe through sharing knowledge and working together we can only strengthen artists roles and improve our situations. Association is better than competition, that way you can build a community from which you can nurture and sustain yourself, your career and others.

At Core we have also set something of a new precedent in terms of our associate members, who are not actually in the studio space itself but contribute significantly to the space such as Jane Boyer and yourself and the artists who contribute to the space or education programme.

I spent 5 years pursuing my own career (and still do) after leaving RCA and it was time to expand myself through the expansion of my own practice through the gallery and it is something I find very fulfilling and rewards me tenfold. Running the gallery and the hard work we do inspires generosity from others in a mutually beneficial way.

JooHee Hwang, Installation View, Sisyphus exhibition © Core Gallery


CP: The programme last year promoted an experimental approach to exhibition-making and placed a strong focus on curatorial concepts. How do you plan to maintain that this year?

RD: This year our exhibition programme is going to continue to be experimental, focusing a little closer to home with myself, Elizabeth Murton and Jane Boyer all curating exhibitions rather than just having guest curators.

Two shows I shall be curating this year: one with Jane Boyer of our DX winners ‘Extra-Ordinary’ in April and an exhibition called ‘Home’ with Annabel Tilley in October. With home, we are exploring this theme in the widest sense of the word- a place of fragility, transition and identity from a cross generation of artists. Artists so far for this project include Graham Crowley, Delaine Le Bas, Rich White, Freddie Robins, Peter Davis, Kate Murdoch, Rose Wylie, Lucy Austin, Emily Speed myself and Annabel Tilley. 

64 almost-identical drawings of Josef Fritzl blindfolded  © 2009 Annabel Tilley


I am finding the process of curating a very interesting, analytical, critical and exploratory role. I am testing new muscles and learning an awful lot. Also working in partnership is something I very much enjoy, the debate, the conversations which lead you to interesting new paths. It is a delight.

We are also delighted to invite back Nicholas Kaplony and Andrew Bryant and we are very excited to be working with Coexist, a dynamic artist led space in Southend in a collaborative project with our studio members that will tour from Coexist to Core at the end of 2011. 


CP: In Jane Boyer’s interview I asked; “What do you think the key is to creating a sustainable artist-run space?” Jane answered, “co-operation… honesty, integrity, trust, sharing, responsibility, communication.” What other strategies are also key to a gallery’s survival and what will you be implementing this year?

RD: I concur with Jane, she has pretty much nailed it: Strong shows, an awareness of the need to be accessible, to be good at promotion and marketing.

Last year we had 11 shows, 3x open studios, 1 community workshop, loads of art talks and it was rather overwhelming and not exactly sustainable (somehow we managed it) so this year we are having less shows and already have our 2011 programme sorted and so it is more manageable for me – so I would say also that balance is also key.

I would conclude in saying that generosity is part of the backbone of what we are doing here, to artists and curators who work with the space and they are equally generous and supportive of us so I think that is part of the success of artist led spaces. I think artists like the freedom of not working with a commercial gallery- it’s a very nurturing way of working, you don’t just feel like a commodity and that is essential and empowering for artists to feel their integrity is being respected and uncompromised.

 
CP: In an AIR interview with Jack Hutchinson you stated that: “In art education there should be compulsory professional practice for artists, which is essential if new graduates wish to survive in the art world and even get a sense of their newly qualified direction.  It is a wilderness out there and you need to do your research.” How important are internships for new graduates?  Can you describe the internship programme you have established and how it has added to the dynamics of the gallery?

RD: I think the internship programme is very important. I value my interns highly and seek to harness their strengths and push them to learn and follow projects that they are passionate about. I have three interns at the moment- Jo who has been with us for about 6 months and helps deal with audience development, Jasvinder who has been sorting and jazzing up our website and creating some fantastic graphics for printed materials.

Charlie Norwood is also joining the gallery team (previously at Goldsmiths) and is going to be undertaking some art writing for the space- critiquing shows or possibly writing essays to accompany the exhibitions which will be a wonderful addition.

Without them, our studio artists and our associate members, core gallery would not exist. They in turn are great supporters of the space. I am very pleased to say that one of our interns has gone onto do a curatorial internship at the Tate.

I think part of the role of the gallery is about good practice and we pass this onto our interns. Core, at every level, gives people room to manage their own projects – such as these wonderful Core Gallery interviews which again increases our profile, is a fantastic educational tool and also contributes to your own career. 


The Eighteenth Emergency: Exhibition shot, 2010 © Core Gallery


CP: Core Gallery’s is re-launching this year with a show in February curated by Andrew Bryant? What can we expect from this show?

RD: This is the second time Core shall be working with Andrew Bryant: his first show the Eighteenth Emergency was a very intelligent experimental show which I really enjoyed and learned from and I know we can expect something similar this year.

I cannot divulge too much more than that about the exhibition at this stage except that the show is going to be exploring the use of technology and within art.

The artists are: Jim Prevett, Niklas Tafra, Chad Burt, Daniel Lichtman, Ciarán Ó Dochartaigh and Adrianna Palazzolo all of whom studied or are studying at Goldsmiths. The work I have heard about so far has sounded compelling, amusing, strong in concept and execution. 


The Eighteenth Emergency: Exhibition shot, 2010 © Core Gallery


CP: A question that is frequently recurrent and is the title of a recent symposium held at Whitechapel is: Art: what is the use? Speaking on behalf of an active artist and gallery director, in your opinion what is art’s use? Any why more than ever is this question crucial?

RD: Artists are incredible. What the general public don’t understand about artists is that they are talented, not just at the art bit. Practising artists know that this is not the only thing we have to do: out of necessity one has to do your own marketing, research and development, manage people, projects, understand law and legal frameworks, create business plans, business development, marketing strategies, organize and manage finance, pr, network endlessly, be adept at negotiation and writing funding applications, leading and managing people, audience development, collector development, education, teaching, professional practice, social engagement and politics. Surviving rejection, funding cuts, knockbacks to name but a few things.....

Out of the desire to survive and sustain and to nurture we learn countless skills: we are analytical, thoughtful, empathetic, compassionate, passionate, philosophical and aware of countless issues.

We draw on a range of skills, experiences, cultures. We are endlessly creative. We are endlessly self educating, self critical, self directive. We challenge ourselves endlessly, we adapt and we try over and over. That takes courage, it all does.
The creative sector works damn hard at being everything we need to be to survive and you know what, we are pretty talented at all this plus the actual making. We need to be recognised and valued further for our contributions to this world. Don’t forget artists are needed, and should be appreciated.


Alyson Helyer, Marion Michell, Tom Butler


CP: Can you tell us about the much anticipated show that is with 2010’s Deptford X Open competition winners; Alyson Helyer, Marion Michell and Tom Butler?

RD: The exhibition is called Extra-Ordinary and will be at the end of April. Jane Boyer and I shall be curating this exhibition and the three artist’s works are going to create a very intelligent show exploring the transformation, subversion and distortion of the normal and everyday into something Extra Ordinary.

The title of the show also reflects the fact that these artists were selected ultimately from over 250 artists and have great promise.

At the moment we are pulling together the curatorial themes and the next thing shall be to visit the artists studios and select works for the show / discuss new possibilities.

Tom who lives and works in America at present is coming to London to be here during the exhibition which is a great bonus too. 


Deptford X Open Competition, 2010  © Core Gallery


CP: You have a blog (Becoming Part of Something). That followed the emergence and development of Core Gallery. Can you tell us how this has been useful to profiling the gallery and gaining a larger audience?

RD: Extremely useful! A blog opens up opportunities for dialogue with artists, curators and many others. The blog is quite unique in the sense that there aren’t many blogs about running a gallery space. It is often about ones own practice so it gives an interesting insight into the amount of work a gallery can do and demonstrates the integrity of our space which then also brings in supporters amongst the artistic and wider community who are now contributing to the space in one way or another. I had not quite expected such a thing, such generosity!

I am as well as others very grateful about the artists talking platform on a-n, it is such a fantastic platform for critical engagement.

One of the most important developments through the blog was the involvement of Jane Boyer as an associate member of Core who has been incredible in the helping of the running of the gallery since Autumn last year.

To expand as well: the support we get from other artists due to the blog is down to the honesty of it I think. The practical challenges. I have a genuine passion for artists and I am constantly fascinated by their practices- I celebrate those things through my blog. At times as well I demonstrate my sheer exhaustion! I think it’s important to be realistic about the challenges artists face and the difficulties of juggling my own practice and my many different roles as artist, teacher, writer, gallery manager, project coordinator and now AIR advisory member.

I also had a letter published in a-n about the workings of an open submission as it is fairly controversial issue amongst artists- (where does the money go to, how is this justified etc) explaining how much work open submissions can take. We have a huge responsibility to the artists we work with to get things right and to change the way artists are treated for the better.

We shall actually be discussing the usefulness of blogs at a future Nuts and Bolts Workshop as part of DIY Educate partnered with a-n.


CP: You were recently elected to the AIR Artists Advisory Group, how do you plan on fulfilling this role and representing and campaigning for artist’s causes?

RD: It was an incredible accolade to be nominated to AIR, to be part of a group that shall contribute an insightful, balanced, representative view on current issues faced by the creative sector, to engage others in a proactive manner with the aim of helping and tackling challenges to achieve the goals faced within the creative sector.

I think that we need to collectively create change in current Government policies, public opinion, employment, galleries etc. Education as well is a hugely important issue for me. Part of my election agenda was as follows and so I hope in the 4 years that I shall be on the AIR council that I shall have been able to contribute towards these goals I have set myself. 

Air Event, 2010 © Core Gallery
  • Helping artists directly by providing them with tools which can enable them to navigate and maximise their impact on the art world while avoiding the pitfalls.
  • Facilitating the development of its members by growing the artist community and representation of artists within cultural institutions.
  • Creating a structured educational programme of artists’ talks to educate others from our own experiences and giving beneficial advice to advance artist’s careers.
  • Promoting the interests of AIR members by effectively building key relationships and ensuring the interests and views of artists are understood and acted upon.
  • Developing the arts by building networks of artists and institutions either directly or indirectly facilitating creative partnerships and arts events.
  • Increase our visibility and emphasising our strengths as a culturally important sector to the public so that we can gain more support for our issues.
  • Helping to Empower Artists as a group not only within the commercial world of galleries but also the wider cultural strata, to be considered as important as any other social commentator working for example alongside government.

CP: Core Gallery has already received a considerable amount of support from its Cor Blimey studio members, associate members, invited artists and curators, but how can people become more involved in supporting the gallery? 

RD: We are looking for patrons, sponsors, supporters on every level! We definitely need more financial support as we have no funding to run the gallery and there is an opportunity for people to contribute with a donation, or to purchase a core gallery chair which is giving an important resource to the space and is a very manageable £10. 

In addition we are very open to people being involved in the space whether it be; helping mount or take down a show, invigilating, flyering etc! A little help can go a long way! Just get in touch, see our support pages or buy a chair!

We are also happy to have the joining of a new associate gallery member Becky Hunter, an artist, art critic and writer who is going to be looking after our press side of things. Basically the door is always open and people can contribute by just coming and enjoying the shows and passing our info onto others.

All our DIY educators are supporting the space which enables us to provide something even more to our audience and community. 


CP: As well maintaining a full exhibition programme Core Gallery facilitates and runs an education programme: DIY Educate. Can you outline what this entails?

RD: DIY Educate is a contemporary education programme run by artists, curators and other art professionals to encourage artistic development for those seeking to further their career in art. 



From peer-led and one to one critiques, professional practice workshops as well as a number of artist’s and curator lectures, DIY Educate provides opportunities to learn, network, share ideas and knowledge, providing impetus for artists to develop their practice. DIY Educate also gives practical guides and resources to help artists survive in an unstable and competitive climate, making the most of their skills. How to get work, how to get paid, how to maintain your career- artists have to do it all for themselves constantly and it is a lot to navigate. It is also the real stuff about surviving, the nitty gritty, that we can all feel disappointed and rejected at times but having worked with many artists and students and the last year at Core we saw there was a real need for artists at all levels (and not just when you first graduate) people can get isolated in their practice, be unaware of how best to push themselves whether creatively or even publicly. Another thing is that the London Art scene is huge, we are creating a nurturing pocket for those who may have just moved to London, giving them an opportunity to tap into a rather huge network. 


Artist Talk: Psychometry exhibition © Core Gallery


CP: In your recent blog you give a rundown of the highs and lows of 2010. Can you describe briefly the highlights and the challenges you have faced. Also what can we look forward to in 2011’s exhibition programme?

RD: I think everything to do with the gallery has been a challenge but a rewarding one. I have been stretched– particularly intellectually. The skills I have gained, the amazing artists and curators I have met, that is beyond measure.

Having never run a gallery before I am proud of all that we collectively achieved and this year we have more support structures in place and even more support than we started out, so I feel very positive about 2011.

The challenges I think will often be the same challenges: trying to find a balance, trying to do everything I can in the time I have, finances…… but we will just get better at this more.


CP: If you could write a Core Gallery manifesto for 2011, on behalf of the arts collective, what would it entail?

RD: Really simple things which is not exactly a manifesto but is how I hope that we can all be:

  • Be generous
  • Maintain your integrity
  • Be respectful and generous to others
  • Nurture art and artists
  • Pull your weight
  • Explore ideas
  • Do not limit yourself or others- be open, seek to understand, to educate yourselves and others.
  • Professionalism
  • Say thank you (and please)
  • Remember that people are not perfect so try not to throw stones.


CP: Is there any news or projects that we haven’t discussed that you would like to divulge?

RD: I have just started working with Matt Roberts as his exhibition manager which is very exciting. I shall be assisting specifically with the Salon photo prize, the Salon video Prize and Julie Cockburns solo show at Matt Roberts as well as working on the catalogues. Matt is an example of someone who is extremely professional, friendly and extremely generous and a very intelligent curator. He has been a great mentor to me and Core Gallery and I am really thrilled about learning more from him and being involved in another fantastic space.

I have also been asked to be on the judging panel for the University of the Arts, Xhibit 2011, which is UAL’s most prestigious annual student exhibition, now in its 14th year. The central aim of Xhibit is to showcase high quality student work from across the numerous colleges of the university, ranging from painting and photography to film, fashion, sculpture, and beyond. The exhibition is expected to reflect the diversity of talent within the university. It is an unexpected honour to be asked.

 

CP: Thankyou very much Rosalind




Monday, 15 November 2010

Interview with Jane Boyer



I am pleased to interview Jane Boyer, our new associate member. Boyer joined the 'Core Gallery Collective' in October. Since then she has been involved in the development and sustainability of the gallery. In this interview I gain insight into her practice, I get a preview of the work she is exhibiting for the forthcoming show 'Relay' and find out how she supports the gallery as an associate member.



advance, 20" x 26" gesso, graphite, oil, acrylic binder on paper, © 2010
image courtesy of the artist


Boyer states in a recent blog: ''I am delighted to be a new member of Cor Blimey Arts. We're already busy at work and it is such a pleasure working with an energetic group of like-minded people.''
 
Boyer studied photography at the San Francisco Art Institute in 1986. Since then she has participated in several exhibitions in the western United States including California, Oregon and Utah. She was an exhibiting artist in the 1988 Nuclear Visions exhibition organized by the Oregon Coast Arts Council which explored the condition of living in a nuclear age. Which toured the United States and Canada for two years.

In 1998 Boyer changed her medium to painting. With discipline and diligence she taught herself to paint. Boyer's current work reinterprets gesture not as a renewal of Modernist theory but she uses gesture to recall the body in time. Placing the body in time, places it in relation to everything else happening at that same moment. It is in this context that the self exists and is also obliterated.
She is currently living and working in France.


November >>



CP: Can you tell us about the collaborative work “Extreme Narrative” that you are exhibiting for the forthcoming ‘Relay Exhibition’?

JB: It is a work based in identity and 'the other'. What I mean by that is the identity represented in Extreme Narrative is in relation to some other person or situation. It is this context which places identity in relief. Extreme Narrative looks at how an identity is interrupted by context, by 'the other'.


CP: Why did you choose to invite guest artist 'Annabel Tilley' to show work alongside yours? What revelations do you think will arise from this collaboration? And how will it re-contextualise the meaning of your '6 obliterations'?

JB: I had been thinking of how I could work with Annabel for some time, even before I joined Cor Blimey, so I had some ideas outlined in my notes about what our work shared in common. When the opportunity arose, I re-read my notes and contacted Annabel straight away. I think the pairing of our work presents a broad view of interrupted identity in that my 6 obliterations offer a psychological balast to Annabel's 64 Fritzl's and her Fritzl's give a tangible sense of reality to my 6 obliterations. 

64 almost-identical drawings of Josef Fritzl blindfolded  © 2009 Annabel Tilley

The moment I saw the work together I could see the meanings of both bodies of work merge to create meaning in 360° - meaning became sort of three dimensional, encompassing abstraction and reality. Annabel's work is based on an actual news story and my work is based in the conception of the psychology and emotion within these 6 subjects - I find this dimensional meaning compelling.
I was struggling to understand why 'innocence' was an obliteration. I could see it as a disarming force, sort of an opposition to negative influence, but that wasn't a fully satisfying rendering. I did a little research into Josef Fritzl and found the meaning that I knew intuitively but couldn't pinpoint. His claims of 'innocence' in saying, and I'm paraphrasing, 'you don't have children with someone if you don't want children,' were utterly destructive to the humanity of his daughter and the children of this forced union - even beyond the other horrendous crimes he had committed against all of them.

 

CP: You have recently become an associate member of the Core Gallery arts collective, can you tell us what attributes you bring, and the vital role you play?  

JB: I was self employed with my husband for over 16 years as a craft jeweller in The States, so I have a background in business, learned the hard way - by doing. All of the organizational skills, marketing skills and general professionalism that I developed come with me. I see my role as one of supportive propulsion. I hope to help move things forward in the paths already laid out. 


6 obliterations - denial
12.5" x 9.5"
acrylic, graphite, ink, pastel, gesso on paper
© 2010
image courtesy of the artist
CP: Since joining Core Gallery you have gained access to an extended community of artists. How do you think this will impact the "moment of creation” within your practice? 

JB: Well, every stimulus goes in and comes back out. For me, that process manifests in that moment of creation. I've worked hard to learn to trust that moment because it is the ultimate unknown. Not only are your movements unpredicted, but the reasons for them are also unknown. And there is no knowing where you're headed. But that is why I said in my blog, 'I never face the white unarmed.' Every time I go to work all the stimuli I've accumulated goes with me, that will no doubt include the stimuli from my colleagues in Cor Blimey.

I've learned to trust the moment that stimuli comes back out and listen to it.


CP: What do you think the key is to creating a sustainable artist-run space?  

JB: Cooperation. It assumes everything else that is vital to success - honesty, integrity, trust, sharing, responsibility, communication. If there is a basic agreement to cooperation among members, then I truly believe obstacles can be overcome, or at least those obstacles become defined and separation can take place, if needed. It's like any partnership, it takes work, but if the will is there the partnership can thrive.

Vif! - solo exhibition August 2010, La Galerie d'art à la campagne
Charente-Maritime France


CP: You have a blog (Working in Isolation: a dialog with history) on Artists Talking. Can you tell us what discussions and dialogues have arisen as a consequence? And how this has been useful to profiling yourself as an artist?

JB: I am so grateful to a-n for the Artists Talking platform. So many discussions have come from my blog it's hard to know where to start. A big discussion of identity has come about with David Minton. He is very exacting and he has demanded some keen explanations from me about how context defines and obliterates the self. I've had wonderful discussions with Rob Turner about technology and nature. I have several dialogues with other artists which happen privately via email but were initiated by Artists Talking. They detail practice, theory, our 'gods' in art, etc. Without question, all this writing and dialogue has helped me to clarify my ideas.

It's damn hard, but I love to be challenged for an explanation of my work or concepts.


CP: Within your paintings we get a fleeting glimpse of ‘gesture’ and the presence of the ‘artist’. There is a Deleuzian sense of becoming and an unresolved quality within the work. Can you talk about the importance of transience within your paintings?

poof!, 20" x 26" gesso, graphite, acrylic binder, © 2010
image courtesy of the artist


JB: We live in a universe of flux, everything moves. Transience is what is real for me. We all carry our histories to each present moment, so what was, is becoming and what is, was. There is no beginning or end, just moments of awareness.

I see 'presence' and 'gesture', for me the indicator of presence, as being fleeting, momentary. The world has changed so much and so rapidly I think the only hope we can have to state our presence is in a flash, as an inscription rather than an expression, to borrow an idea from Sean Burke, Jacques Derrida et al.


alight, type C print, © 2010, image courtesy of the artist


CP: Your practice is heavily engaged within the painting medium. However recently you mentioned that you have started to work with the photographic image again, can you talk about what direction this has taken? And how the two mediums inform one another?  
JB: My photography has always been abstract, I feel that is an important thing and makes the transition practically seamless. Essentially, I can do different things with abstraction according to each medium. Photography allows me to work with what I 'see', painting allows me to work with what I 'feel' in a sensory, tactile sense. I think the precision of seeing, via photography guides my painting and the imperfection of my movements in painting animates my photography.


CP: Do you have any forthcoming projects / news to divulge?

JB: I'm going to be co-curating an exhibit with Rosalind Davis in the spring and I'm really looking forward to that. I want to develop a curating practice as well. I know it's a hip thing now to be an artist/curator, but I've been interested in curating for years and the opportunity for me to explore that is now with Core Gallery.


CP: What achievements would you like to reach in the coming year both professionally and as an artist?

JB: I suppose, at the moment, the two go hand-in-hand for me. I would like to do more work with sculpture, and this would require the space to make and present it. I'm thinking a lot about history right now and I'm noticing other references to history as I read. In my mind I'm dismantling the notion of history as linear and I want to explore that.

 

CP: Thank you very much Jane!

JB: Thank you Chantelle. I'm delighted to be a member of Cor Blimey, it's really exciting!

Wednesday, 27 October 2010

Interview with Nick Kaplony




It is a pleasure to interview Nick Kaplony, a freelance curator, practicing artist and education officer at Battersea's Pump House Gallery. He is also the programme coordinator of Artquest.

Untitled (Siren) © Debbie Lawson
Kaplony is curator of the forthcoming exhibition at Core Gallery 'Psychometry', an exhibition of works by 12 contemporary artists that channel and manifest the intangible and invisible through their work. The exhibition takes its title from a practice employed by psychics and mediums, whereby past events and personal histories are divined through physical contact with an object.

I talk to him to find out his motivations on contemporary curating, more about the forthcoming show, and his recent developments within his work. 





October >>




CP: Can you tell us about the forthcoming show at Core Gallery ‘Psychometry’?


 Monkey No 6 © Peter Jones, 2007, 30.5cm x 25.5cm, oil on linen



NK: Psychometry is a group show that takes it title from a practice undertaken by spiritualists and psychics that allows them to ‘read’ the intangible attributes of an object by touching it, such as its history, or the history and emotions of the previous owner. It’s looking at artists who can be said to do a similar thing with their practice: Making intangible and invisible ideas associated with their subject and the materials they’re working with manifest and visible.




There are twelve artists including myself involved in this show Claire Haddon, Peter Jones, Sean Langton, Debbie Lawson, Sophie Molins, Michaela Nettell and Tom Simmons, Richard Paul, Helen Pynor, Melanie Stidolph, Karen Stripp. All with very different approaches.

Jungtis © Michaela Nettell and Tom Simmons, May 2008
To give you a flavour of some of the sort of thing to expect: Debbie Lawson’s carpet sculptures and furniture installations which take gallery visitors on a psychological journey through domestic space, where everyday things are eerily animated and the very fabric of the interior comes to life. Peter Jone’s paints meticulous portraits of old toy monkeys. The wear and tear of their history animates their features and imbues them with character and life. Richard Paul immaculately photographs seemingly disparate objects. The photographs are at once detached, poetic and evocative, the pairing of objects suggests not only a relationship between them but an overarching significance that is greater than the sum of its parts.


Range © Richard Paul


CP: You were recently involved in the judging panel of London Art Award 2010 that was part of the London Fringe Festival.? You said: ‘I see it as the Fringe Festival’s role to help discover hidden gems.’ What did the festival unearth and what were the highlights of the selected works?

NK:
Well it’s the first year of the festival, so it’s really just the tip of the iceberg, but it’s already showed up the vast diversity of practice being undertaken. There are some impressive developments in painting particularly this year.

CP: You were involved in the Slowfall projects, an artist-led collective that held the aim of ‘creating local and international exhibitions of art in unconventional venues’. How important is the ‘space’ when considering the curation of a show?

NK:
There are many different approaches to curating and putting an exhibition together. I enjoy working on exhibitions where the work has some kind of relationship to the space its being shown in. Particularly when exhibitions are put on in locations or buildings with a rich history of strong identity of their own. It’s a wasted opportunity to ignore that I think.

Installation shot from 'Ringing'. Exhibition in St Augustine's Tower,  2003 © Nick Kaplony


CP: The collaborative process has become a growing interest within contemporary curating, with exhibitions such as ‘Indian Highway’ at Serpentine Gallery, 2008 and Subversive Practices at Württembergischer Kunstverein Stuttgart, 2009. What is that excites you about the polyphonic voice within the exhibition process?

NK:
One thing to say is that I think curating is (ideally) a collaborative process even with only one curator involved, where the curator is collaborating with the artists they are working with. When a group takes on the task of curating much of what excites me about it can be said to be true of collaboration in any process: If its goes well several points of view bringing unexpected results, greater than the sum of its parts. There’s also a relinquishing of control which is liberating.
Vigour Mortis © Jock Mooney, Exquisite Corpse Exhibition


© David Raymond Conroy, Exquisite Corpse Exhibition


CP: What are the challenges and uncertainties, involved with putting a show together, such as: Exquisite Corpse, Core Gallery, 2010 which brought together 11 artists and curators. How did you effectively manage the collaborative process?

NK: It’s funny because Exquisite Corpse, though it was most certainly a collaborative exhibition, in that contributions came of several artists and curators, there was very little collaborative process in making it happen, no negation and no compromises that often play a part on collaboration. I set up a system, and a set of rules whereby curators/artists could make contributions to the show without having an overall vision of the exhibition. A chain of curators was created. Each curator then made a selection of work based on that of the previous curator in the chain. The work was placed in the space in the order that it was chosen. 

Exquisite Corpse, Exhibition shot, 2010 © Core Gallery


CP: ‘Exquisite Corpse’ was an experimental approach to curating that presented the viewer with an insight into the selective processes involved. Was it your intent to demythologize the notion of the ‘exhibition’? Will this exhibition influence future projects?

NK: I was interested in how artwork is interpreted, and how people make connections between individual pieces. I thought that setting up this chain of selectors visitors would get a flavour of the processes and thinking involved in putting an exhibition together. I’m sure it will have an influence on future projects but I’m not quite sure how yet. Its bubbling away at the moment


CP: Where do you get your inspiration for curatorial projects and does your own practise inform your approach? 

NK: Definitely, the sort of themes and ideas that I’m interested in my practice are also the things that I’m excited by as a curator (though not exclusively). In terms of what can lead me to develop ideas as a curator, it can be anything from a space, or sometimes I see an artist who’s work I particularly like, and then, gradually, as I come across other artists in my work, I can’t help but see connections and slowly the idea for a show is formed. This is very much what happened with Psychometry, the next exhibition I’m working on at Core gallery.


Breath, 2010 © Nick Kaplony
CP: What are you currently working on within your own practice?

NK:
I’m working on a new video work called “Breath” which is an exciting departure for me. I haven’t worked with moving image before (well, barely). It’s leading me down an interesting path, looking at ideas around faith and medicine.













CP: How do you resignify artworks in order to create a fresh perspective that has a strong curatorial authorship?

NK:
I think (hope!) that creating a sense of curatorial authorship isn’t my concern. In getting a body of work together inevitably the relationship between individual pieces in an exhibition colours the reading of the works, they resonate and effect each other, and I guess you try to create connection which highlight relationships that you have observed as a curator and also offer the possibility of new interpretations.


CP: As the programme coordinator of Artquest, the London-based service provider for visual artists. Would you have any advice to offer graduates, in preparing their degree shows? Approaching gallery spaces and the continuation of their careers?

NK:
In a nutshell read the Artquest website! No, seriously everything that you need to know is on there and it’s an invaluable resource. But in terms of bite sized advice: Treat your degree show as it’s the beginning of your career as a professional artist, not as the end of your studies and with regards to approaching galleries, unless they specifically say they accept unsolicited proposals, don’t approach them cold! Build a relationship gradually.


CP: Do you think the economic downturn offers the possibility to cultivate a new landscape for the art world? What impact do you think this has on artists and institutions?

NK:
I would use the word necessity rather than possibility. Its going to make it harder for everyone, but it will be interesting to see what direction practice takes when there is less money / funding leading the way.


CP: And finally if you could curate any show, with any artist/s and in any space what would it be?

NK:
That’s tough. I’d love to do something in huge country manor, with a maze and sprawling grounds. As to the specifics of the artists it would depend on the location but something with a mix of young and more established practitioners.


Thank you Nick Kaplony!


Tuesday, 19 October 2010

Interview with Rachel Price


© Nicholas Bailey
I am pleased to interview Rachel Price an Independent Curator and Artist. In this interview I gain insight into the possibilities of sculpture, art’s political potential through contemporary curating and I find out about the highly anticipated exhibition ‘Sisyphus: The Absurd Hero’.  

Price draws together the work of 7 exciting UK artists presenting new sculpture and video responding to the Greek Myth of Sisyphus. The exhibiting artists all explore notions of the absurd, futility and circularity in their practice whilst simultaneously displaying an immersion in the process, be it material or conceptual.

Price’s sculptural practice examines the often frustrating relationship between image and form, working on the assumption that our physical experience of the world helps inform our conceptual formation of it.
Alongside her studio practice Price works as an independent curator providing opportunities for emerging and established artists to produce new works in response to challenging curatorial themes. Price graduated from the University of Reading in 2006 and has exhibited throughout the UK.


> > October 2010

 


Still from ‘Daedalus’ © Rodney Dee

CP: Can you tell us more about the forthcoming exhibition at Core Gallery ‘Sisyphus: The Absurd Hero’? 

RP: It was a case of a number of elements coming together at the same time and an attempt to articulate a general air of impotence and repetition in the art world. I was simultaneously researching the work of some absurdist writers, and revisited the works of Albert Camus and specifically 

'Chandelier' © Nicholas Bailey
‘The Myth of Sisyphus’ which seemed particularly apt. As a sculptor the intense physicality of Sisyphus’s unrelenting toil to absolutely no end was such a bittersweet image, I had to investigate it further. Most notably I recall the line: “[ ] …..his hatred of death, and his passion for life won him the unspeakable penalty in which the whole being is exerted toward accomplishing nothing”. The sentence carries such a weight, something I wanted to try to embody. 

I had also just come across the work of Nick Bailey, a sculptor recently graduated from Wimbledon College of Art, whose work seemed to articulate this impotence and disappointment so well. From there I recruited the other artists, using the imagery of the Myth of Sisyphus as a springboard.


CP: Could you describe in detail how each of the artists respond to the Greek mythology of Sisyphus? 


RP: Pleasantly surprised by the breath of interpretation the artists presented in relation to the myth, I came to view the notion of the absurd in a new light. But also how relevant they all believed the myth to be at this point time, the commitment and depth each artist had invested in their works and research was evident.

Starting with Nick Bailey, who was already dealing with a realm of mild disappointment and temptation in his work. However I should highlight the distinction between the tension in works like ‘magic missile’ where we are presented with the promise of release and the utter impotence of works like ‘The End and the Finish’ which seemed more appropriate in this context. Bailey’s works presented me with the biggest challenge editorially.


‘Life Pencil’ © Alexander Bates
My interest in Alexander Bates’ practice was his recent investigations into what defines something as an artwork. Rooted in previous laborious and repetitive works (‘No chewing in class’) and his rebelling what he identifies as a ‘very human compulsion to create order out of disorder’. Interestingly Camus purports that the absurd lies in the conflict between what we want (meaning/reasons) and what we are supplied with (formless chaos). Bates’ work ‘The Life of a Pencil’ is a drawing of a pencil, made using a pencil until the pencil runs out: A succinctly pointless, labour intensive and humourous work to the tune of some 60 metres. 

Jim Bond’s kinetic work lends itself particularly well to the theme. The piece he is showing ‘Dust’ was made a couple of years ago and Bond presented it for Sisyphus. Bond uses the human condition as a springboard for his mechanical works, reductive and subtly humourous these works highlight the circular nature of the everyday. The disparity between the mechanical aesthetic and very human content of the work seems particularly relevant here.


‘Dust’ © Jim Bond
Rodney Dee‘s interest in Sisyphus lies in the perpetual nature of the act in relation to some higher purpose: “For wherein most rituals offer the allusion of transcendence; Sisyphus’ own efforts at pushing the rock are a testament to his absurdity – continually reinforced with every failed attempt. As a result his description as an ‘absurd hero’ is well deserved, for whilst he never reaches the apex of the hill, he is never fully released from the cycle either and therein lies the opportunity to try again”. Dee refers to the fabled architect Daedalus in his video work in which the story underpins mans innate desire to escape from the human condition whilst elevating himself to a celestial vantage point.  


 ‘Continuous Space’ © Joo Hee Hwang
Joo Hee Hwang’s questioning of the idea of territory results from personal experience of finding herself in unfamiliar surrounds. She explores what she terms as ‘subjectivity of space’ through her vast sculptural installations. Hwang’s specific interest in the myth lies in the notion of a world within a world, the realities we create for ourselves. For Sisyphus, the mountain became a world within itself, a new reality. 

Matthew Kay’s work ‘After This all has Passed’ was a result of Kay’s resistance to the idea of futility and nihilism in relation to the myth of Sisyphus. “What may appear to be a blank screen is in fact animated from hundreds of laboriously made black felt tip drawings. Challenging the notion of nihilism, that anything is futile, it questions the existence of impotent art objects or an empty gesture; are there really such things?




































My personal interest in the myth lies in the physicality of the task without reward or meaning the action is for it’s own sake and Sisyphus his own master - this is an extension of my interest in the interplay between our physical and conceptual worlds, and that a work of art should strike a balance between the two.  The work ‘Labour the Point (Water Torture)’ is essentially tautologuous, going to unnecessary, repetitive lengths to little conceptual gain.  The work literally outweighs itself.


CP: What can we expect from Part 2 of Sisyphus: The Absurd Hero?

RP: Originally I split the works of the 12 artists into two parts as there was a huge distinction between:  ‘resistance’ (retained hope in face of absurd) and ‘acceptance’ (almost celebrated futility, labour intensive) works.  I later decided to present a more balanced view of these interpretations within both shows.  For example: presenting Matthew Kay’s resistance of the notion of nihilism alongside Nick Bailey’s casual acceptance of it.  I think in Part II this disparity is more pronounced.  I think there’s a humour about this show.  A device perhaps we employ in the face of the absurd.


'You’ve Carried Your Ashes Now Carry Your Fire’ © Matthew Kay

 
CP: Would you say that this exhibition is a response to the continual ‘circular’ nature of an artist’s practice?

RP: It’s part of it, but more so a feeling of lack of progress or inventiveness in general, that we are recycling ideas.  The circularity of art practice is inevitable, the more you work the more problems you face.  No line of enquiry is ever concluded, it’s about feeding your own curiosity.


CP: You recently had a solo show with ‘Squid and Tabernacle’ that was held in a shipping container. What were the considerations and challenges of working site specifically? And how will you and the other artists utilise the space at Core Gallery?

RP: Squid and Tabernacle approached me at a good time with the challenge of this space. As a nomadic gallery they select their artists in response to a site, an extremely novel approach to curatorial practice.  Artists should be able to contextualise their practice temporally, geographically and conceptually, this project forced me to do this.  The Hartwell site was literally a hole in the ground when I arrived in April, the sea container empty and ready for me to do as I pleased.  

‘Planning Permission’ Installation View, 2010 © Rachel Price
The final installation ‘Planning Permission’ utilised reclaimed materials from the immediate area to recreate ‘unfeasible architectural models’ by means of both reflecting; the state of flux of the area, but also the boundaries we should push when re-thinking our urban environment.  As part of the installation I tipped the container at an angle and filled a corner with concrete as to utilise the maximum potential of the space, something I never could have achieved in a gallery.  The work of projects like Squid & Tabernacle that get contemporary art out in the public realm are integral in rethinking the way we present and view art.

In terms of Core, there’s an energy which I think comes from being slap bang in the middle of two rows of studios.  The shows I’ve seen there so far have had a painting bias, but I relish a challenge to rethink the established conventions of a space.


CP: As an ‘artist working curatorially’ can you tell us how the collaborative process of working with the artists is enhanced? Do you feel that by working collectively in this way provides the artists with a greater autonomy?

RP: As an artist my concerns aren’t going to be that far detached from any other artist working now, so to provide a platform to voice those concerns is important.  For instance I was struck by the response I received for my call for artists for Sisyphus, what I believed to be a fairly specific line of enquiry within my own practice was actually reflecting the feeling of quite a few artists at this time.

I think I decided to approach other artists with opportunities to show in response to quite restrictive themes to force the reassessment of the relevance of our practice.  Something I think curators are failing to provide at the moment.  Moreover because of the dire economic climate, especially with the further cuts to arts funding, the stance of individual artists and institutions can go one of two ways: The individual artist tries to make their practice more financially viable and ‘plays it safe’ or will look for ways of independently funding curatorial projects, free of the constraints of funding applications will have uncensored reign over their content, and that’s quite exciting.


CP: Previously you curated an exhibition at Lewisham Arthouse titled ‘Skinflint’.  The artists deliberately used ‘lo-fi materials’ at a time where there was a ‘trend for an outlandish decadence in approaches to art-making’. This exhibition seemed to be a reaction to consumerism & the art market, but also highlighted a change in how we consider art-making.  Can you talk about arts political potential through exhibition making?

Installation View ‘Skinflint’ 2009 © Rachel Price
RP: For me it was completely reactionary, I do believe it was the revelation of Damien Hirst’s diamond encrusted skull in the middle of an economic downturn that did it for me.  To this day I still can’t understand where he was coming from with that work.  So it was not so much about the dire situation of the economy at large more so the role of the artist in reaction to it.  Hirst was case in point. 

For me the role of an artist is as an inventor, and when means are restricted we are forced to invent, to rethink.  The artists I included in this show were artists I admired for their unique utilisation of materials.





Exhibition View: SkinFlint, 2009 © Ralph Dorey



In addition I think the work of an artist is always inextricably linked to the environment it is being made in, either consciously or unconsciously.  The job of the curator is to pick up on these trends artist to artist and make them relevant to the now.  Individual artists tend to be so engrossed in their practice that they don’t see the immediate relevance or urgency of the work they are making.  Exhibition making, in turn, is an excellent platform for the ‘feel’ of a time to be projected back out into the public sphere.






CP: What are you currently working on within your practice? And what is important to you as sculptor?

‘Nervous Wreck 002’ 2010 © Rachel Price
RP: My work on Sisyphus has been very research heavy, and has lead me down some disparate lines of enquiry.  I continue to research the absurd but am also very interested in the nature of creativity itself in psychological enquiry, namely the work of Mendick who identified the creative object as ‘the union of two distinct and disparate nodes’.

In this respect the work of comedians like Stewert Lee and Mitch Hedberg are as important as any fine artist.  I am taking this idea quite literally in my studio investigations and applying it to my image/form studies. 



As a sculptor this element of experimentation is hugely important, both in material and conceptual investigations.  I’m concerned that sculpture is becoming too language dependent, that the role of instinct and material investigation is becoming obsolete. A balance between head and body is important.
 
I recently revisited the work of Hermann Obrist at the Leeds institute and remember thinking ‘this is scupture’. Obrist invented form, new ways of negotiating and viewing our physical world – that is what a sculptor should do.  The dance between abstraction and representation, somewhere between physical truth and subjective experience, but made with an empathy for the human condition.  

‘Delusions of Grandeur’ 2006 © Rachel Price

A sculptor should favour experience over representation, this is particularly relevant now in the digital age and presents all sculptors with a dilemma.  I myself am a self confessed luddite and worry about the implications of over over-reliance on images and digital reproduction and how it will effect learning and progress, especially at a developmental level in children.


CP: You reach new possibilities within your work by your liberal use of materials. Can you talk about how your choice of materials adds to the physicality of form and to the conceptual narrative?

‘Sweet Enough’ © Rachel Price
RP: I use a lot of reclaimed materials that tend to be laden with their own preconceptions and assumed uses.  I find it interesting how materials are often assigned a gender as a result of the above.  In addition I find images hugely seductive, but misleading, in pairing image with form I attempt to highlight the disparity between representation and the reality of the physical world.

There’s a lot of destruction in the process – bending, impaling, snapping, and this is hugely important in the way I approach and rethink the use of materials.  As I’ve mentioned before, the physical presence of the work should serve as a tool to affirm the conceptual narrative.  They should be interdependent. 


CP: Do you have any forthcoming projects / news to divulge?

RP: ‘Sisyphus: part deux’ is in the offing.  At the moment my curatorial projects are taking precedence over my own studio practice.  I’m also working on a research proposal for the upcoming residencies at the Henry Moore Institute in Leeds.


CP: You are based at ASC studios in New Cross, situated within a growing community of artists. How important has this been to you in the development within your work as both a curator and an artist?

RP: The New Cross/ Deptford areas are a great place to be for an artist.  I find the freedom of the artist led studios and galleries highly conducive to an experimental and risk taking approach as an artist and curator, projects like Deptford X reflect the needs of the artist but are also sensitive to the area in which the art is shown.  Conversely I also think that it is important, in a growing community of artists, not to become isolated from movements in the rest of London and the UK, and indeed internationally - that a dialogue should be encouraged both within the community and with the wider sphere.


CP: Thank you Rachel Price!

For more information, please visit: www.rachelpricesculpture.co.uk